Saturday, February 7, 2015

Peter Cooper — The Macro-Institutional Delimitation of Economic Complexity


What Peter is calling attention to in this post is addressed in sociology in terms of the interaction of the micro, mess and macro levels. Each is influenced by the others and in turn influences the others.

What is the difference between the macro, meso, and micro levels. Complex social systems are comprised of individuals or agents that are the elements of the system, the relationships such as affiliations and institutions that group individuals, and the system itself. A complex social system is a web or network of element that are configured in nodes with the overall context of the structure and function of the system in which they are embedded.

Failure to any of the relevant aspects of a system into account in an explanation will limit the explanation. Obviously, everything cannot be considered in an explanation, whose purpose is simplification for modeling. However, failure to include relevant aspects of the system or failure to model them correctly relative to the system will vitiate the explanation.

Economics has not yet come to grips with this approach, at least for the most part. This is actually stated as part of the methodological assumptions for methodological convenience. Sociologist, on the other hand, admit that modeling general cases in complex social systems is usually not possible to achieve, and so they are more modest in their approach to analysis and explanation.

heteconomist
The Macro-Institutional Delimitation of Economic Complexity
Peter Cooper

1 comment:

Matt Franko said...

Peter summarizes Arthur's work here:

"Arthur’s piece is only short, so not everything could have been covered, but I find this brief description of the economy quite telling. There is no state. Or, at least, the state is too insignificant to mention. There are no institutions. No system as such. There are just patterns that emerge out of spontaneous behavior.

Then Peter says here in summary:

"Macro policy and macro institutions, appropriately designed, enhance space for spontaneity at the micro level."

He is observing that our design processes are NOT spontaneous ones... he's correct they are not...

imo all of this spontaneous, "Laissez-faire", "competitiveness" BS that characterizes our contemporary economic system is straight out of some sort of Spencerist/Darwinist nightmare...

rsp,